RICO Act Violation

Buy the Book, Fraud: The Unforgivable Crime


Contact Us




 'Ted' Theodore Lewis Whidden

Create Your Badge







































































































































































     Exposing Fraud and Deception to protect the public good.

    www.frauddocumentation.com     TheBrainCan.com    www.frauddevelopment.com  


---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: Ted Whidden <[email protected]>

Date: Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 7:23 AM

Subject: Fwd: Meeting in your Office

To: [email protected]

Cc: Ted Whidden <[email protected]>





Your employee Ana Maria Garcia has certain obligations under Misprision of Felony Statutes regarding this and other conversations.

Are your people making the right notifications?

This ties back to American Bar rules as well.

The "counsel" spoken of in this email is Herman Laramore's employee,

H. Guy Green.   This is going to get progressively sticky for all involved.  Guy Green threw your whole bunch under a bus, and he threw Herman as well.  Surely someone can begin to see this pretty quickly.

While, we are talking about Guy Green............... Can you explain why I am being "targeted" at the Jackson County Court house?  This image/notice has Guy Green's phone number under mine for a call back.

WTF?  Glenn as a keeper of law you are beginning to see you have action to take against Guy Green.  There is much information in the filings.

Glenn you won't be able to stay out of this much longer.  Stopping the Abuse of Process and taking action in your own house is best in my opinion.  Your office's abuses have rendered me unemployable in my field.  I have nothing better to do than work on this right now.   By the end of the next week several of you will be defending your right to practice law.  If you affect my income I feel turnabout is fairplay.  Process can work for or against a person as you should know.

I can be reasonable.  I have been patient awaiting an adult to take the helm of this thing and make some good calls.................BTW: Look in your file for a document dated 11/17/2015.  You client/claimants entire statement is dismantled line by line.  I did your job for you.  Meanwhile, it has been in your file over 60 days, and my request for Speedy Trial could have been disposed of in the same/less time.

Ted Whidden

---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: Ted Whidden <[email protected]>

Date: Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 1:06 PM

Subject: Re: Meeting in your Office

To: Ana Garcia <[email protected]>

My Counsel is refusing to accept evidence that would end this quickly and efficiently.  According to his own statements he makes money irrespective and has low/no interest in resolution.  He appears to be extending this longer than practical for his own benefits to the detriment of the State who is paying him, and me as client.  As you know this is unlawful and unethical.  You can request a meeting with his presence if you wish.

You can review your own file, the fifteen minute (bullshit) deposition of your claimant focused on "Landlord-Tenant" issues when this is clearly a "Grand Theft" case.  The Public Defender is off track and the same deposition demonstrates he is conflicted and lost on the subject of the case.  Further his office has advised me that he deposed fifty (50) people on that same day.  Clearly he is conflicted on each of these cases as is your office for allowing such to occur.

I have requested copies of the Public Defender's other deposition (Larry Birges) with no response from his office.  Presumption is they never requested it.

Review of your file will begin to demonstrate this is actually an EXTORTION case, with your office being used by the complainant for Jennifer Slay's extortionist plot.  You and your office are aiding and abetting her felony attempts.  Several are outlined within your file as far back as August 2015.  Any moron can see you are moving forward a "hearsay" case with no real "witness".  Your case is filed by a low integrity felon who is/was using the property for housing stolen property and meth production.   (Note in her deposition she tries to steer law enforcement to outlying buildings where she and her accomplices were storing stolen goods.)  Meanwhile, your removal of goods contrary to the court agreed stipulation of the property owner being present corrupts your inventory, ownership, possession, and valuation requirements.  You appear to be partying with her ruse.  She is manipulating your office.  This is abuse of process on her part, and malicious prosecution on your part.  (Conventionally your office would not be liable, but you are in contempt of your own order/agreement.  This presents a landmark opportunity in itself.  You have a criminal conspiracy on your hands, and you are in the middle of it.  Corruption and incompetence all along the way further taints your pursuits and the appearance.)

Your file is corrupted at all levels and if you continue pursuit I reserve the right to embarrass everyone named in the file.  This is not a threat.  This is my obligation under requirements of Misprision of Felony statutes.

I encourage a meeting with deposition of Jennifer Slay to follow to see how far she will take her ruse.

I understand your office may perceive no threat to the case under the Public Defendant's control as he appears to be working for you, and against the taxpayers and client.  It is unlikely he will be able to carry through with this case as his position is becoming exceedingly compromised.  If I need to file complaints on all legal counsel involved in this charade I can.  It is/was my desire to resolve this quickly with little embarrassment/exposure, but the choice is fully in your hands.

You have a baseless case, by a low integrity complainant, without evidence or witnesses, and all evidence points to your complainant as a felon.  The Public Defender should know you can't win, but he is milking the State, and failing in his fiduciary obligations.  As this continues I am being dragged behind a bus I prefer would stop and re-assess the drivers.  The courts will view poorly on your handling moving forward given this advice, as will any jury or court you continue to waste time in this pursuit.  You are advised fairly.



Ted Whidden


On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Ana Garcia <[email protected]> wrote:

> Mr Whidden:

> If you are the Defendants in this case, our office cannot speak to you.  You

> are represented by counsel.  Any communications by you to our office should

> be made through your attorney.

> Ana M.  Garcia

> As outlined at the bottom of the message:

> Case:

> State of Florida vs Theodore L Whidden , 15-276

> I see case number was not included in the original message.

> There are a number of issues best discussed in person.

> Sincerely,

> Ted Whidden

> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Ana Garcia <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Mr Whidden:


>> What case would you like to meet about?  Once I have that information, I

>> can

>> make a determination regarding what would be the best time.


>> Ana Garcia


>> On Nov 4, 2015 9:08 AM, "Ted Whidden" <[email protected]> wrote:


>>> Ms. Garcia,


>>> I would like to schedule a meeting with you in your office regarding a

>>> case your office is pursuing.  I believe I can relieve the State of a

>>> substantial effort and expense to overcome a hurdle you simply cannot

>>> overcome.  Pursuit is futile for all parties as it is progressing and

>>> stands to cause substantial embarrassment and abnormal costs for all

>>> involved.


>>> I can be reached at any time via email or phone.  In many cases I can

>>> be in your office within 1-2 hour notice if we can mutually agree to

>>> work towards closure of this matter.


>>> Ted Whidden

>>> 850-685-2353


>>> Case:

>>> State of Florida vs Theodore L Whidden



>> Please be advised that Florida has a broad public records law, and all

>> correspondence to me via e-mail may be subject to disclosure.  Under

>> Florida

>> Law e-mail addresses are public record.  If you do not want your e-mail

>> address released in response to a public records request, do not send

>> electronic mail to this entity.  Instead contact this office by phone or

>> in

>> writing.

> Please be advised that Florida has a broad public records law, and all

> correspondence to me via e-mail may be subject to disclosure.  Under Florida

> Law e-mail addresses are public record.  If you do not want your e-mail

> address released in response to a public records request, do not send

> electronic mail to this entity.  Instead contact this office by phone or in

> writing.





"At the heart of the First Amendment is the recognition of the fundamental importance of the free flow of ideas and opinions on matters of public interest and concern. The freedom to speak one's mind is not only an aspect of individual liberty and thus a good unto itself but also is essential to the common quest for truth and the vitality of society as a whole."

Supreme Court Judge Scalia wrote concerning Pope v Illinois

"Just as there is no use arguing about taste, there is no use litigating about it."

Copyright May 2016, All rights reserved by Ted Whidden