RICO Act Violation

Buy the Book, Fraud: The Unforgivable Crime


Contact Us




 'Ted' Theodore Lewis Whidden

Create Your Badge

     Exposing Fraud and Deception to protect the public good.

    www.frauddocumentation.com     TheBrainCan.com    www.frauddevelopment.com  

Ethics Violation Filing on:

Laura K. Wahlquist, Florida Bar 84776

Attorney Wahlquist is clearly guilty of ethics violations, harassment, Abuse of Process, Malicious Prosecution, and a host of other crimes as she perpetrates a Criminal Conspiracy using State and County resources in conjunction with her partners is a scheme of Extortion.  Any moron can see the frivolous nature of her pursuits using less than credible witnesses, absence of evidence, absence of any basis for a charge or case all in effort to further their schemes.  At a minimum Wahlquist in the associated crimes is Aiding and Abetting.  A simple view can see where Wahlquist is furthering her own criminal agenda using various unlawful mechanisms and approaches, some of which are outlined herein.

As Wahlquist and her band of hooligans, henchmen, and accomplices have operated outside permissions, agreements, and their jurisdiction they have committed numerous Civil Rights violations.   They should be abundantly aware of the Civil Rights of another, and their violation thereof.   By way of perpetrating and continuing their felony activity in conjunction with the felony activities of others they appear deeply entangled in a criminal conspiracy of both their own making and the making of another (Jennifer Slay).  Their failure to prosecute Jennifer Slay for her felony initiation and continuance of her deceptions clearly places the criminally operating officers in collusion/cooperation with the primary criminal conspiracy that gave rise to the abuses.

Wahlquist was advised as per her own file 15-276CF on 8/3/2015 that her office had committed at minimum an ETHICS VIOLATION by agreeing one set of terms for conditional release of a victim (See attached), and violating that conditional release within 36 hours.   This clearly is a Civil Rights violation and Theft by way of Florida Statute and of course an ethics violation.  Note attached conditional release dated 30 July 2015.  Wahlquist and/or her agents agreed in item “N” of the conditional release on 30 July 2015 to notify and insure presence of a property owner for removal of property from his dwelling.

1)      Condition of release was violated on July 31, 2015 and thereafter wherein property was removed without the owner’s presence or notification.  Clearly this is an ethics violation, theft, and Civil Rights violation.

2)      Wahlquist and/or her agent had the area probation supervisor (Stacey Goodson) order the property owner to unlock a gate giving access to the property.   Goodson therein partied with Wahlquist on her crimes as listed in the 8/3/2015 filing of the owner with the office of Wahlquist.

3)      Wade Mercer (Attorney) also appears to have partied with this unlawful conduct as he signed the order which was violated.  (See attached).

4)      Wade Mercer (Attorney) clearly partied further with Wahlquist by detaining the undersigned thereafter unlawfully on multiple occasions, and facilitating both the theft and retention of personal property.

5)      It is believed that Mercer signed the original unlawful warrant initiated by Berges/Wahlquist’s unlawful actions.

6)      Larry Berges/Birges (??) partnered numerous times with Wahlquist to further the ruse.  Several of his violations to further her conspiracy are outlined in Wahlquist’s file along with those of Donnie Branch, and others under their employ and direction.

7)      Lou Roberts and his staff clearly partied with Wahlquist by furthering the Wahlquist agenda, and supporting it with multiple frauds and deceptions as outlined in Wahlquist’s file and the list of witnesses recently submitted.

8)      The access, search, seizure, and retention of personal property is all unlawful from a number of approaches.

9)      Wahlquist’s initial pursuit is completely corrupted and considered frivolous because her/her agents tampered with evidence in an alleged “Grand Theft” case in which there never is/was any inventory, ownership, possession, or valuation established.  By removing the evidence or allowing it and facilitating its removal Wahlquist has staged a mis-trial at best, based on her own criminal corruption and corruption of her agents.

10)  Corruption and incompetence of the Wahlquist team is mounting.  Thus far a host of personnel have committed acts to further Wahlquist’s felonies, thus all are Aiding and Abetting her criminal scheme.

11)  Wahlquist in her criminal schemes is furthering another’s criminal schemes, thus each are Aiding and Abetting the other.  The file from as far back as August 2015 reflects knowledge of same, and Wahlquist’s continued actions/inactions are furthering that scheme.  Clearly Wahlquist is partnering with a known felon (Jennifer Slay) to perpetrate a host of crimes.

12)  Failure by Wahlquist to protect the victim (Undersigned) from the crimes of Jennifer Slay is a violation of undersigned’s rights.

13)  Failure of Wahlquist to protect the victim (Undersigned) from the crimes of the County/State are a violation of undersigned’s Civil Rights, and places all involved clearly in conflict with their official duties.

14)  The attorney Charles Wynn presented Anna Garcia who works as an accomplice in Laura Wahlquist’s schemes with the concept that withholding personal property is/was a violation of Civil Rights (Title 42).  Anna Garcia dropped charges.  In turn Laura Wahlquist communicated with Laura Watson of Lou Robert’s office blocking lawful access of the undersigned to his personal property.  Mind you the removal and retention of personal property initially was a violation of Civil Rights, and the continued retention furthers that criminal scheme.

On August 3, 2015 (date stated August 6, 2015 in the Wahlquist file) advice was given of 24 felony and felony related charges against Wahlquist’s client.  Florida law affords a victim certain protections, actions, etc.  Wahlquist and her office have failed to initiate those protections for the victim (undersigned) filing the complaint on August 3, 2015 as received by them August 6, 2015.  Wahlquist’s criminal behavior before and since that filing are furthering the criminal scheme of another.  Wahlquist and her agents are partying with and furthering a criminal conspiracy as outlined therein and elsewhere.  Wahlquist’s criminal activity is clearly with knowledge and forethought as her file has reflected the status as far back as August 2015, with criminal schemes initiated by Jennifer Slay in May 2015.

On August 13, 2015 (date stamp received on August 14, 2015 at Wahlquist office) the property owner (undersigned) outlines twenty (20) additional felony charges against the legal team/pursuits of Wahlquist and her team including but not limited to:

1)      False Statements in a policy report

2)      Fraud (Material Misrepresentation of Fact)

3)      Fraud-Concealment

4)      Willful and Wanton Negligence

5)      Wrongful Prosecution/Malicious Prosecution

6)      Abuse of Process

7)      Criminal Mischief

8)      Wrongful Arrest/Warrant

9)      Reckless endangerment

10)  Illegal Access, Search, Seizure

11)  Criminal Extortion

12)  Harassment

13)  Criminal Felony

14)  Criminal Conspiracy

15)  Misprision of Felony for failing to report these unlawful acts/situations

16)  Obstruction of Justice

17)  Tampering with Evidence

18)  Collusion

19)  Waste, Fraud, and Abuse

20)  Prosecutorial Misconduct

Clearly Wahlquist and her agents have tampered with a host of documents and evidence, thus corrupting their own criminal and lawful pursuits.  Meanwhile, Civil Rights violations abound, and it appears the nature of Laura Wahlquist’s conduct and behavior as well as that of her office.  (Clearly, the initial violation of Whidden’s Civil Rights and the multiple violations thereafter required a host of criminal actions and inactions by her team.)

Wahlquist initiated action producing a false warrant leading to unlawful access, search, and seizure of a person’s personal property.  She has repeated the misuse of judicial resources to commit Civil Rights violations, thefts, and harassment as outlined following.  Noting Wahlquists initial filing was unlawful as outlined in her file 15-276CF

Attachments to the 8/13/2015 filing (date stamped received on August 14, 2015 in Wahlquist file) clearly establishes Fraud and Criminal Corruption of officials connected with Wahlquist’s frivolous pursuits.  Follow-up documents filed in November 2015 re-affirms the criminal misconduct of officials working to further Wahlquist’s ruse.  The November filings highlight the ongoing criminal deceptions to further the schemes.

On 11/18/2015 following direction by Public Defender (Attorney) Charles Wynn a property owner provided local Sheriff’s office with a notice of dismissal of a trumped up firearms charge.  (Owner was unlawfully targeted, accessed, searched and property seized based on view as stated above).  Firearms (six in total) were removed from the vehicle of the owner.  Charges were brought, then dropped due to a clear-cut Civil Rights violation.  According to Karen Watson of Jackson County Sheriff Department Wahlquist made attempts to block the owner from picking up the six firearms as personal property seized during the unlawful arrest.  Wahlquist continues her harassment, Abuse of Process, and Malicious Prosecution knowing she has no case, no evidence, no witness, no possibility for prosecution.  Her criminal use of resources is clearly unlawful, unethical, and constitutes violation of Civil Rights of undersigned.  Her frivolous pursuit is clearly waste, fraud, and abuse of a taxpayer, using taxpayer resources for her crimes.

Wahlquist and the local Sheriff’s removal of personal property unlawfully and retaining it unlawfully actually constitutes violation of Florida Law and Civil Rights laws.  In fact it is violation of Florida Statute 812.014 (1) and (2)(c). (F3-L2) (Yes, that is where this all started.)  Further as firearms are involved:  812.014  (2)(c)(5) Firearms.

There are a number of accomplices in Wahlquist’s crimes.  Many of which are listed in filings with the State’s Attorney file 15-276CF. Thus far it seems all officials who have touched the file have partied with Wahlquist’s unlawful abuses, setting the stage for a landmark case in the State of Florida.  The whole charade stems and is furthered by unlawful actions/inactions of the State’s Attorney office.  Where typically these jackasses would have a level of protection from prosecution, their unlawful and unethical acts as stated herein and elsewhere removes that protection because they are making overt unlawful actions on their own.   This opens the door to pursue them personally, professionally, and corporately.  This further jeopardizes all their activities under their Florida Bar license.   Further to this, all of their agents are able to be prosecuted as Aiding and Abetting in the ruse with full knowledge.  This is the problem with ethics in and low standards in the legal profession, it opens the door for a host of prosecutorial response on government agencies.

As a result of a scandalous Collusion issue Wahlquist is party to, the owner/victim of her abuse submitted documents directly to her office.  That Collusion/Ethics scandal is subject to another filing to be made in follow-up to this one……..Wahlquist following attendance at the Court House Office in Jackson county had one of her accomplices (Larry Birge/Berges) in the ongoing criminal ruse contact the undersigned to advise there is/was a trespass order being issued to prevent the undersigned from contacting Wahlquist or her office.  For this reason, Wahlquist’s notification of this filing will have to come directly from the Grievance Committee.

Wahlquist has a number of accomplices in her abuse/deceptions.  Several are Florida Bar Attorneys, several are not.  Thus far officials have committed various deceptions, actions, and inactions to further her criminal ruse.  This is a scheme, and a criminal conspiracy by definition.

I will be reviewing for consideration the following which will actually bar bonding for the officials.  They are outside their jurisdiction in their actions as they know.

42 U.S. Code § 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.

(R.S. § 1979; Pub. L. 96–170, § 1, Dec. 29, 1979, 93 Stat. 1284; Pub. L. 104–317, title III, § 309(c), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3853.)

As you know the Florida Bar is a collection of the most heinous criminals in the State.  I do not really anticipate any action of the Florida Bar, because you represent and facilitate corruption.  The protection of the bar, by the bar actually places you in a position of collusion.  You know you genuinely do very little to protect the citizens, but more importantly you protect your bar members.  In failing to take proper action, you are actually in collusion protecting these crooked pieces of shit.   Additional filings should sufficiently expose your failures to rein in your reckless accomplices.

Signed this day: November 23, 2015



Theodore L. Whidden

P.O Box 158

Chipley, Florida 32428

[email protected]


Conditional Release 30 July 2015


Supreme Court ruled unanimously written by Judge William Rehnquist concerning Hustler Magazine v Jerry Falwell

"At the heart of the First Amendment is the recognition of the fundamental importance of the free flow of ideas and opinions on matters of public interest and concern. The freedom to speak one's mind is not only an aspect of individual liberty – and thus a good unto itself – but also is essential to the common quest for truth and the vitality of society as a whole."

Supreme Court Judge Scalia wrote concerning Pope v Illinois

"Just as there is no use arguing about taste, there is no use litigating about it."

Copyright May 2016, All rights reserved by Ted Whidden