www.FraudDocumentation.com   

 

Home

RICO Act Violation

Buy the Book, Fraud: The Unforgivable Crime

www.TheBrainCan.com

Contact Us



===

www.tedwhidden.com

Facebook

 'Ted' Theodore Lewis Whidden

Create Your Badge

 
     Exposing Fraud and Deception to protect the public good.

    www.frauddocumentation.com     www.frauddemonstration.com    www.frauddevelopment.com  

 

 

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 14th

JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR

JACKSON COUNTY, FLORIDA

CASE NO: 15-276CF

State of Florida

                v.

Theodore L Whidden

                Defendant.

_______________________________/

 

 SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1

 

CONTENT OF FILE

 

RULE 16: DISCOVERY and INSPECTION

 

The following is being filed “Pro Se” by the Undersigned to this Court in regards to the ongoing BAD FAITH, Abuse of Process, Prosecutorial Misconduct, and Harassment administered and overseen daily and routinely by this Court and its Officers.  The abuse is extreme and routine in this Court, this circuit, and this office.  Judge Shonna Young Gay is either deeply involved in a host of Schemes or is extremely ignorant to what is taking place all around her.  Corruption at its core has followed every facet of this BAD FAITH case without probable cause.  This pervades the SPEEDY TRIAL aspects and violations of the Defendant’s rights as well.

Irrespective of any future change in the disposition of this file, the Defendant makes this a standing request.  Nothing whatsoever including dropping or dismissal of case can absolve the attorneys holding these files, their offices, their agents or principals from fulfilling this request.  This discovery will clearly lead to U.S. Civil Rights and Federal filings, so the concept of withholding (CONCEALING/FRAUD) in this matter is clearly in the playbook of the crooked attorneys.  They must comply and continue to comply.  Dismissal of the case is not reason or excuse to fail in the demand made herein.   The goal is clearly to disbar these attorneys and no effort to stop or slow this effort will help them, rather it will encourage the pursuit and serve to impune them and their principals further.   Clearly the Jackson County Court Officers and the 14th Judicial Circuit is housing known criminals.  Failure to provide documents timely is a violation of the State who will likely pay the penalty while these attorneys are in jail.

I have request copies of my files multiple times, multiple ways, from multiple people as it regards the above referenced case.  Based on a “Rules of Advocacy” approach I requested via the Courts and via Ethics Filings on BOTH the States Attorney (Glenn L. Hess) and the Public Defender (Herman Laramore).  The reason I have filed “Ethics Complaints” with the Florida Bar is because due to the criminally corrupt nature of all dealings so far on this case I have found that Florida Bar filings are the only way to get anyone to perform properly.  Note specifically each filing with the Bar has produced predictable responses and in most cases suitable response for the interim.   The problem with the absolute requirement for filing ACAP Florida Bar complaints is it demonstrates the absolute irrefutable use of unlawful force, harassment, prosecutorial misconduct and abuses as advocated and implemented by both Laramore (Herman) and Hess (Glenn L.).   They have by design created and operated a criminally operating Scheme tantamount to racketeering.  If anyone, anywhere in their territories did business this way these turds would be on top of them.  They must recognize their behavior, their legacy and their people as criminal operatives.  I outline this because we will continue and teat down these criminal strongholds because the citizens deserve better, and it is imperative to keep American great.

I have also made a suitable “BRADY DISCLOSURE” request for the file and ongoing data for/from the file.  This is somewhat redundant, and in part I make this and other filings to demonstrate the absolute, irrefutable requirement for the State to provide copies irrespective of the games they are playing.  Their games are unlawful, harassment, Abuse of Process, Prosecutorial Misconduct, and meant to abuse someone the State has made self-determination to be off balance mentally.  This would of course be a RICO ACT (ongoing) violation.  The State is RACKETEERING as demonstrated herein and elsewhere.

RULE 16: titled DISCOVERY AND INSPECTION requires the Government to provide records upon the request of the Defendant.  It is not a requirement that a Defendant say and “magic words”, express himself in legalese, or come on bent knees to the crooks holding the information.  A simple request is sufficient.  It has been made multiple times in multiple ways including but not limited to the photos attached herein.   This is all in line with the Rule as stated.

With this filing I am calling for a full and ongoing BRADY DISCLOSURE as well as all information and data available per Rule 16 as stated.  This will be for now and ongoing.

The Undersigned’s attempt provide information and evidence to the States Attorney file as evidenced in the photos attached was the early attempt by the Undersigned to gain confidence in the file and file maintenance by the prosecution at a time when it was reasonably known that prosecution was in criminal collusion with the Public Defender H. Guy Green.  At that time the criminally operating States Attorney Laura Wahlquist advised she would be vetting information and either accepting or rejecting information to be used as evidence in the case/file. 

Clearly Attorney Laura Wahlquist is in violation of her OATH OF OFFICE in failing to allow inspection, copies and presentation of evidence to file by a defendant.  By way of copy to a new ethics filing on Wahlquist and Hess we hope to see this educational issue changed within their criminal organization.

As we move along it is clear the Court in which this has been launched is likely out of its authority, element, and jurisdiction.  This likely became a Federal matter as soon as the State legal representatives began partying to affect the life and livelihood of a citizen.  This is clearly a violation of Civil Rights via the U.S. Code title 42 section 1983 at a minimum.  By using their office and opportunity to bring about unlawful hindrances of personal rights this escalated out of their own jurisdiction and authority at or immediately after the filing of the initial unsubstantiated, frivolous complaint.  Clearly the Court must now invite Federal oversight to this case and turn the records and officers over for Federal prosecution.

I reserve the right to amend any and all filings as well as bringing additional filings as deemed necessary.  In the meantime this harassment/abuse is costing me substantial hardship financially, physically, and otherwise.

Notification of the Agent signifies notification of the Principal.  Notification of the Principal signifies notification of the Agent.

                RICO Act Racketeering is becoming easier to demonstrate at each round.  Maybe someone wants to read what has been filed with the Court and/or sent to them?

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY this as a true copy of the foregoing to be delivered to the States Attorney office and State Legal Representation via their accomplice to their crimes, Larry Birge at the Jackson County Sheriff’s Office.  Attention:

 

Ana Maria Garcia, Florida Bar #577162;

Laura Wahlquist, Florida Bar #87776

Attention Glenn Hess, States Attorney Florida Bar # 287806

Herman Laramore, Public Defender Bar #131906

Pam Bondi, Attorney General, Florida Bar # 886440

Elijah Smiley, Chief Justice 14th Judicial, Florida Bar # 508918

FBI, Regional Office

Publicly made available.

 

Jackson County Board of County Commissioners

2864 Madison Street

Marianna, Florida 32448

Telephone: (850) 482- 9633

Fax: (850) 482- 9643

E-mail: support@jacksoncountyfl.com

 

                                                                                THEODORE WHIDDEN

                                                                                The Victim of the Crimes/Conspiracy

THEODORE WHIDDEN, The Victim of the Crimes/Conspiracy, DEFENDANT in lawful presentation of Jackson County Case No. 15-276CF; 

P.O.Box 158, Chipley, Florida 32428

Phone: 850-685-2353  Email: TedWhidden@gmail.com

 

By:___________________________________________

THEODORE L. (Ted) WHIDDEN

An Abused Member of the Public

                                                                                2/16/2016

 

 


 

Rule 16. Discovery and Inspection

(a) Government's Disclosure.

(1) Information Subject to Disclosure.

(A) Defendant's Oral Statement. Upon a defendant's request, the government must disclose to the defendant the substance of any relevant oral statement made by the defendant, before or after arrest, in response to interrogation by a person the defendant knew was a government agent if the government intends to use the statement at trial.

(B) Defendant's Written or Recorded Statement. Upon a defendant's request, the government must disclose to the defendant, and make available for inspection, copying, or photographing, all of the following:

(i) any relevant written or recorded statement by the defendant if:

• statement is within the government's possession, custody, or control; and

• the attorney for the government knows—or through due diligence could know—that the statement exists;

(ii) the portion of any written record containing the substance of any relevant oral statement made before or after arrest if the defendant made the statement in response to interrogation by a person the defendant knew was a government agent; and

(iii) the defendant's recorded testimony before a grand jury relating to the charged offense.

(C) Organizational Defendant. Upon a defendant's request, if the defendant is an organization, the government must disclose to the defendant any statement described in Rule 16(a)(1)(A) and (B) if the government contends that the person making the statement:

(i) was legally able to bind the defendant regarding the subject of the statement because of that person's position as the defendant's director, officer, employee, or agent; or

(ii) was personally involved in the alleged conduct constituting the offense and was legally able to bind the defendant regarding that conduct because of that person's position as the defendant's director, officer, employee, or agent.

(D) Defendant's Prior Record. Upon a defendant's request, the government must furnish the defendant with a copy of the defendant's prior criminal record that is within the government's possession, custody, or control if the attorney for the government knows—or through due diligence could know—that the record exists.

(E) Documents and Objects. Upon a defendant's request, the government must permit the defendant to inspect and to copy or photograph books, papers, documents, data, photographs, tangible objects, buildings or places, or copies or portions of any of these items, if the item is within the government's possession, custody, or control and:

(i) the item is material to preparing the defense;

(ii) the government intends to use the item in its case-in-chief at trial; or

(iii) the item was obtained from or belongs to the defendant.

(F) Reports of Examinations and Tests. Upon a defendant's request, the government must permit a defendant to inspect and to copy or photograph the results or reports of any physical or mental examination and of any scientific test or experiment if:

(i) the item is within the government's possession, custody, or control;

(ii) the attorney for the government knows—or through due diligence could know—that the item exists; and

(iii) the item is material to preparing the defense or the government intends to use the item in its case-in-chief at trial.

(G) Expert Witnesses. At the defendant's request, the government must give to the defendant a written summary of any testimony that the government intends to use under Rules 702, 703, or 705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence during its case-in-chief at trial. If the government requests discovery under subdivision (b)(1)(C)(ii) and the defendant complies, the government must, at the defendant's request, give to the defendant a written summary of testimony that the government intends to use under Rules 702, 703, or 705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence as evidence at trial on the issue of the defendant's mental condition. The summary provided under this subparagraph must describe the witness's opinions, the bases and reasons for those opinions, and the witness's qualifications.

(2) Information Not Subject to Disclosure. Except as permitted by Rule 16(a)(1)(A)-(D), (F), and (G), this rule does not authorize the discovery or inspection of reports, memoranda, or other internal government documents made by an attorney for the government or other government agent in connection with investigating or prosecuting the case. Nor does this rule authorize the discovery or inspection of statements made by prospective government witnesses except as provided in 18 U.S.C. §3500.

(3) Grand Jury Transcripts. This rule does not apply to the discovery or inspection of a grand jury's recorded proceedings, except as provided in Rules 6, 12(h), 16(a)(1), and 26.2.

(b) Defendant's Disclosure.

(1) Information Subject to Disclosure.

(A) Documents and Objects. If a defendant requests disclosure under Rule 16(a)(1)(E) and the government complies, then the defendant must permit the government, upon request, to inspect and to copy or photograph books, papers, documents, data, photographs, tangible objects, buildings or places, or copies or portions of any of these items if:

(i) the item is within the defendant's possession, custody, or control; and

(ii) the defendant intends to use the item in the defendant's case-in-chief at trial.

(B) Reports of Examinations and Tests. If a defendant requests disclosure under Rule Rule 16(a)(1)(F) and the government complies, the defendant must permit the government, upon request, to inspect and to copy or photograph the results or reports of any physical or mental examination and of any scientific test or experiment if:

(i) the item is within the defendant's possession, custody, or control; and

(ii) the defendant intends to use the item in the defendant's case-in-chief at trial, or intends to call the witness who prepared the report and the report relates to the witness's testimony.

(C) Expert Witnesses. The defendant must, at the government's request, give to the government a written summary of any testimony that the defendant intends to use under Rules 702, 703, or 705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence as evidence at trial, if—

(i) the defendant requests disclosure under subdivision (a)(1)(G) and the government complies; or

(ii) the defendant has given notice under Rule 12.2(b) of an intent to present expert testimony on the defendant's mental condition.

This summary must describe the witness's opinions, the bases and reasons for those opinions, and the witness's qualifications[.]

 

 

 


 

 

Laura Wahlquist/Ana Maria Garcia

c/o Lt Larry Birge, Jackson County Sheriff Department

4012 Lafayette Street

Marianna, Florida

 

From:

Theodore L. Whidden

P.O.Box 158

Chipley, Florida 32428

 

Reference:

State of Florida vs Theodore L Whidden  15-276CF

 

12/16/2015

 

To the State’s Attorney Office 14th District,

 

I visited your office (on or about October 26, 2015?) requesting copy of your file (verbally and in writing) against me in The State of Florida vs Theodore L Whidden.  (Your logs should reflect same, and should be copied to this file as well as the Ana Garcia emails thereabouts)I also reached out (via email) to Ana Maria Garcia to come together to resolve this.  At the time you were steeped in collusion with counsel appointed by the Public Defender’s office who was not performing.  Your entanglement increases due to your “business as usual” practices.  Unfortunately your “Business as usual” is corrupt.

As you know on December 15, 2015 your accomplice H. Guy Green stepped aside as counsel.  As counsel representing myself “Pro Se” I would AGAIN like to request official copy of the State’s Attorney file with supporting depositions and all manner of documents, notes, recordings, etc.  As they say “any and all” parts of your file and investigation or lack of investigation as the case may be must be included.

As you will now see and as you should have seen at that time you MUST provide complete copy of your file upon demand.  You failed to do this the first time and instead attempted a “Trespass Order” by one of your other accomplices.   The collusion efforts with inept counsel to block my lawful defense incriminates both you and Green.  Can you see this?  This will cause you problems as we move along. 

As one can imagine at this point, any failure to provide notes/documents/evidence copies in/from your file will result in additional filings with the Bar and the Court.  As Laura Wahlquist’s stated agenda is to act as a gate-keeper for evidence in the file, then her job will become increasingly convoluted trying to protect herself protecting an extortionist plot.  It appears your office has quickly fallen in to the criminal conspiracy position.  You are conflicted with your position.  If you have not consulted with Glenn Hess directly on this, then you should at this time.  A fresh perspective will likely demonstrate you are missing the forest for the trees.

With this file request I am enclosing “StatesAttorney3” folder of photos and recordings, and recopying “StateAttorney2” and “StateAttorney” so please make sure these are duly included in the evidence/files you send to me.  As advised previously I am requesting copy of file in part to make sure documents are being properly received, handled, and stored.  It is my right to audit your performance in this way and report your criminal transgressions.

Also, as Karen Watson of the Jackson County Sheriff Department is noted on the voice recorder speaking about firearm return (On July 30, 2015) and as you and your colleagues are being accused of Grand Theft in regards to those specific firearms in this specific case, then we will need to add Karen Watson to the list of witnesses.  Your list of named witnesses should now reflect all those listed by me to this point and Karen Watson as well.  I will leave it to you to subpoena all of these for pre-trial and trial.  If you do not subpoena them in light of your recent and past performance then clearly there will be ethics and other filings considered.  You are clearly operating in unlawful manner to affect my financial status and ability.

If/When you finally review your file and realize you haven’t any case to pursue please contact me immediately to resolve.  It would have been much less painful if you had done this earlier.  As one can see my book release has been affected and a host of other problems have now occurred which will serve to spiral costs out of control for the frivolous pursuit.  For the sake of good order I submit a signed copy of my book, “The Answer to Cancer: A Simple Solution for the Western Condition” to the State file because this indeed appears to be what it is all about…………..Note: Your frivolous pursuits have altered our Christmas launch of this product, affected countless thousands/millions of people to which you may find yourself responsible for.  No doubt this will give your creative thinkers in your office something to ponder as costs spiral out of control.

I would recommend you seek counsel.  This is not your typical opportunity at extortion.  There will be no deals and ultimately you have to try a case in Court that will leave you looking completely inept and corrupt.  We are moving towards a landmark Florida case, but Ana Garcia has already been made aware of that. (See emails).

Please provide full copy of your file including all documents, recordings, evidence, etc by certified mail to my address above no later than 25 December 2015.  This should make for an interesting Christmas for all.  As I defend my right to earn a living, then so will you.

Sincerely,

 

Ted Whidden

 

Enclosures:

CD evidence with numerous photos, text messages referring to meth lab, recorded messages referring to meth lab and a host of other pertinent data.  A copy of the 2015 book release, THE ANSWER TO CANCER: A SIMPLE SOLUTION FOR THE WESTERN CONDITION

 

To make effective use of the postal system,  I am enclosing:

1)      Notice of Unavailability

2)      Motion for Sanctions Against Opposing Counsel

3)      Motion for Sanctions Against Opposing Counsel (2)

4)      Motion for Sanctions Against Opposing Counsel (3) Prosecutorial Misconduct

5)      Motion to Dismiss

 

New Documents included for completeness:

Motion for Sanctions Against Opposing Counsel (4) Scheme to Defraud, Organized Fraud, Communications Act,  This document set includes the Condition of Release July 30,2015 and the August 7, 2015 notification sent to the Court.

(This Motion will also be sent as an Addendum to the multiple Ethics Violations with the Florida Bar)

 

 

 


 

 

To:

H.Guy Green

4187 Clinton

Marianna, Florida 32446

From:
Theodore L Whidden

P.O.Box 158

Chipley, Florida 32428

 

Reference:

State of Florida vs Theodore L Whidden  15-276CF

 

12/16/2015

 

To Attorney H. Guy Green,

As you know on December 15, 2015 you requested that you be withdrawn as counsel on my case with the State.   As a result my new counsel will need copy of your complete file including all recordings, documents, notes, phone notes, etc.  (ANY AND ALL supports and/or evidence in your file including internal documents.)

I request you send full and complete copy immediately to me via Certified Mail so that we can move this case along.  It is not your choice what you send me or when.  You are required to send the complete copy immediately upon demand and I am making that demand.

Failure to expedite shipping of full and complete given light of your behavior, performance, and at will withdrawal, will further bring opportunity for filings.  This is not a threat.  This is advice because you have proven yourself to lack what is required to carry this case through the system. 

I look forward to receiving the file prior to Christmas 2015 via Certified Mail.

 

Sincerely,

 

Theodore L Whidden

 

 

 

 

"At the heart of the First Amendment is the recognition of the fundamental importance of the free flow of ideas and opinions on matters of public interest and concern. The freedom to speak one's mind is not only an aspect of individual liberty – and thus a good unto itself – but also is essential to the common quest for truth and the vitality of society as a whole."

Supreme Court Judge Scalia wrote concerning Pope v Illinois

"Just as there is no use arguing about taste, there is no use litigating about it."

Copyright May 2016, All rights reserved by Ted Whidden