www.FraudDocumentation.com   

 

Home

RICO Act Violation

Buy the Book, Fraud: The Unforgivable Crime

www.TheBrainCan.com

Contact Us



===

www.tedwhidden.com

Facebook

 'Ted' Theodore Lewis Whidden

Create Your Badge

 
     Exposing Fraud and Deception to protect the public good.

    www.frauddocumentation.com     www.frauddemonstration.com    www.frauddevelopment.com  

 

Ms. Bondi,

You have a fast developing RICO Act (Racketeering Case) on your hands.  As you know the Attorney General has obligations to the State and Federal Government, including but not limited to Section 1961 and 1962 of Federal Statute.

I am advocating a meeting Friday afternoon (January 15, 2016) in your office to avert a train wreck for the State/County.  Previously you have been notified of penalties to the State/County in excess of $138 million.  With RICO Statutes this will triple in both State and Federal Court...........Yes, we are about to exceed $1.6 billion.

You are required to initiate protections for the Undersigned/victim, and take action.  Is a meeting warranted, or will you be turning this over to Federal authorities?

There is clearly a corrupt scheme in play with criminals at the helm.   The Undersigned is seeking protection from the Criminally operating State/County officials.  Of course, they are following a pattern/process that is inherently criminal at its core (Racketeering).  They have created a false fear/threat, and operate as the protection or the hammer.  At its core they lack conventional foundation for their original pursuit.  It is an unlawful fishing expedition.

It would be a mistake for anyone to allow this to continue.  It is a requirement of the State and your Office to involve and urge prosecution under both State and Federal Statute.  On that issue, I will not back down.

I have fulfilled my duty to the best of my knowledge under Misprision of Felony statutes to notify all concerned.  I shall continue.  Your action/inaction will involve you.  Choose wisely.

BTW:  It is time you notified Governor Rick Scott officially.  Clearly there are obligations concerned and this will escalate as a result.

Please forward copy of this message to my email address and acknowledge receipt of same.

Sincerely,

 

Ted Whidden

 

(I recognize your disclaimer advises this is available for inspection pursuant to Chapter 119 of Florida Statutes.)

Note:

All information submitted with this complaint is subject to public inspection pursuant to Chapter 119, Florida Statutes.

Whoever knowingly makes a false statement in writing with the intent to mislead a public servant in the performance of his official duty shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 837.06, Florida Statutes.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pam Bondi

Attorney General Notification and Responsibilities under RICO Act for Prompt Investigation and Intervention in a Florida State Racketeering Charge:

 

§ 1966. Expedition of actions

In any civil action instituted under this chapter by the United States in any district court of the United States, the Attorney General may file with the clerk of such court a certificate stating that in his opinion the case is of general public importance. A copy of that certificate shall be furnished immediately by such clerk to the chief judge or in his absence to the presiding district judge of the district in which such action is pending. Upon receipt of such copy, such judge shall designate immediately a judge of that district to hear and determine action.

 

 (1) The Attorney General shall designate a racketeering investigator to serve as racketeer document custodian, and such additional rack­eteering investigators as he shall determine from time to time to be necessary to serve as deputies to such officer.

 

 

Relevant Sections of RICO Act at this time:

RICO Act

 

§ 1961. Definitions

As used in this chapter

(1)   racketeering activity means (A) any act or threat involving kidnapping,  robbery, bribery, extortion,

which is chargeable under State law and punishable by imprisonment for more than one year; (B) any act which is indictable under any of the following provisions of title 18, United States Code: Section 201 (relating to bribery), section 1341 (relating to mail fraud), section 1343 (relating to wire fraud), section 1503 (relating to obstruction of justice), section 1510 (relating to obstruction of criminal investigations), section 1511 (relating to the obstruction of State or local law enforcement), section 1512 (relating to tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant), section 1513 (relating to retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant),  section 1951 (relating to interference with commerce, robbery, or extortion), section 1952 (relating to racketeering),  (D) any offense involving fraud connected with a case under title 11 (except a case under section 157 of this title),

 

 

§ 1962. Prohibited activities

 (a) It shall be unlawful for any person who has received any income derived, directly or indirectly, from a pattern of racketeering activity or through collection of an unlawful debt in which such person has participated as a principal within the meaning of section 2, title 18, United States Code, to use or invest, directly or indirectly, any part of such income, or the proceeds of such income, in acquisition of any interest in, or the establishment or operation of, any enterprise which is engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce. A purchase of securities on the open market for purposes of investment, and without the intention of controlling or participating in the control of the issuer, or of assisting another to do so, shall not be unlawful under this subsection if the securities of the issuer held by the purchaser, the members of his immediate family, and his or their accomplices in any pattern or racketeering activity or the collection of an unlawful debt after such purchase do not amount in the aggregate to one percent of the outstanding securities of any one class, and do not confer, either in law or in fact, the power to elect one or more directors of the issuer.

 (b) It shall be unlawful for any person through a pattern of racketeering activity or through collection of an unlawful debt to acquire or maintain, directly or indirectly, any interest in or control of any enterprise which is engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce.

 (c) It shall be unlawful for any person employed by or associated with any enterprise engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce, to conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprises affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt.

 (d) It shall be unlawful for any person to conspire to violate any of the provisions of subsection (a), (b), or (c) of this section.

 

 

§ 1966. Expedition of actions

In any civil action instituted under this chapter by the United States in any district court of the United States, the Attorney General may file with the clerk of such court a certificate stating that in his opinion the case is of general public importance. A copy of that certificate shall be furnished immediately by such clerk to the chief judge or in his absence to the presiding district judge of the district in which such action is pending. Upon receipt of such copy, such judge shall designate immediately a judge of that district to hear and determine action.

 

 (1) The Attorney General shall designate a racketeering investigator to serve as racketeer document custodian, and such additional rack­eteering investigators as he shall determine from time to time to be necessary to serve as deputies to such officer.

 

 

 

"At the heart of the First Amendment is the recognition of the fundamental importance of the free flow of ideas and opinions on matters of public interest and concern. The freedom to speak one's mind is not only an aspect of individual liberty – and thus a good unto itself – but also is essential to the common quest for truth and the vitality of society as a whole."

Supreme Court Judge Scalia wrote concerning Pope v Illinois

"Just as there is no use arguing about taste, there is no use litigating about it."

Copyright May 2016, All rights reserved by Ted Whidden