www.FraudDocumentation.com   

 

Home

RICO Act Violation

Buy the Book, Fraud: The Unforgivable Crime

www.TheBrainCan.com

Contact Us



===

www.tedwhidden.com

Facebook

 'Ted' Theodore Lewis Whidden

Create Your Badge

 
     Exposing Fraud and Deception to protect the public good.

    www.frauddocumentation.com     www.frauddemonstration.com    www.frauddevelopment.com  

List of Charges for Jennifer Slay and accomplices filed this 8/6/2015, Thursday.  One accomplice is listed in phone recordings.  The presumption is there are/were others who facilitated her removal and the ongoing abuses some of which are listed below.

I would sincerely like to file these charges, with warrant and arrest to follow through immediately.  Note my property is still being violated by this hoard of hooligans, noting Sheriff’s report of 8/4/2015.

 

1)      Felony Grand Theft (Multiple Counts)

2)      Burglary

3)      Possession of Stolen Goods

4)      Breaking and Entering

5)      Violation of Court Order (Multiple Counts)

6)      Conspiracy to Defraud

7)      Criminal Mischief (Multiple Counts)

8)      Threats (verbal)

9)      Aiding and Abetting Fraud

10)   Harassment

11)   Aiding and Abetting Harassment (Criminal Mischief)

12)   Trespassing (Multiple Counts)

13)   Trespass of a conveyance (Multiple Counts)

14)   Felony Trespassing

15)   Violation of a written order for trespassing

16)   Vandalism (Multiple counts)

17)   Littering

18)   Drug paraphernalia/Products for making Crystal Meth

19)   Conspiring to manufacture and distribute an illicit drug

20)   Child Abuse/Child Endangerment (Multiple Counts)

21)   Falsification of Police Reports (Multiple Counts)

22)   Abuse of Process (Multiple Counts)

23)   Felony Fraud

24)   Injunction/Restraining order needed

I reserve the right to add more charges as we go, and anticipate the State’s Attorney office and others may have charges they wish to bring.  Unfortunately, to date their focus seems askew from what I can see as they are chasing a case on hearsay, meanwhile they can verify all of the following:

I also reserve the right to pursue those involved both personally and corporately for their indiscretions in conjunction with this mess.  As we can see the State’s Attorney is purposely chasing charges against Mr. Whidden on hearsay which they know they cannot substantiate.  As this continues they need to consider dropping the charges early, or be prepared to defend their own reckless and baseless position which in itself is Abuse of Process by a State Law Enforcement Agency.  The State’s Attorney office must make due consideration to repent from their current tack, and understand they are defending someone who falsified a host of filings.  You have no substantiation for your charges against Whidden.  Much of the following list of charges stems from your mishandling of a frivolous case.  How far do you wish to go with it?

 

 

1)      Felony Grand Theft: 7/31/2015, Irrespective of understandings/misunderstandings, Jennifer Slay’s removal of property from 2298 Pollywog Lane constitutes Grand Theft.  Valuations and Inventory of items removed to be gained from Jennifer Slay’s previous filing against the land owner at Pollywog Lane.  Jennifer Slay with help removed items owned by Mr. Whidden before, during and after Sheriff department attendance on Friday, 7/31/2015.  (Clearly the removal obscures the State’s “case” against Whidden for any valuation level.  The “Grand Theft” charges against Whidden were in regards to an unspecified amount, quantity and quality of goods.  The State’s case is a hoax, however if Whidden’s charges are to be at felony level, then removal of precisely the same goods irrespective of inventory by Slay is felony theft according to her own false reporting.  What a tangled web.  Meanwhile, State must drop their felony charges on Whidden for failing to place valuation or allow valuation.)

A)     The above outline lists “Multiple Counts” of Grand Theft because there have been removals from three dwellings listed as follows:

i)                    2298 Pollywog Lane, Marianna

ii)                   2296 Pollywog Lane, Marianna

iii)                 2300 Pollywog Lane, Marianna

B)      To this point no one has sufficiently addressed, acknowledged, or supported which if any of the dwellings that Jennifer Slay and her accomplices have or had access to.  This is a tangled web of deception that the State Attorney’s office is being drawn in to.  Slay’s notice of Trespass clearly concerns two at a minimum, and very likely all three when one works through the nuances of the situation.  Oddly, people want to call it “Landlord-Tenant”, yet Landlord-Tenant cannot apply to all three dwellings.

2)      Burglary: Removing items without owner present or notified per Court Order.  The items stolen from Mr Whidden’s property on Pollywog with the assistance of Law Enforcement likely included BOTH items Whidden owned, and remotely a possibility of a few items belonging to Slay.  Slay’s complete removal based on her false reporting and sheriff/State response complicates things.  Mr. Whidden’s opportunity to monitor removals was taken away by the burglary, trespassing, unlawful entry, and theft.

3)      Possession of Stolen Goods:  Within Slay’s belongings (if she owned anything at all) were items/goods believed to belong to Mr. Whidden’s.  These were both obtained prior to Slay’s arrival in March 2015, and subsequent.  Some of the goods were removed from areas with or without Mr. Whidden’s knowledge, express acceptance, or awareness.  The mere loading or a truck/trailer at Whidden’s property and driving away with or without law enforcement constitutes possession of stolen property.

4)      Breaking and Entering: Access and Entry obtained with or without a key is breaking and entry.  Noting the door knob on the front of the dwelling had been changed previously by Jennifer Slay and/or her agent(s)

5)      Violation of Court Order (Multiple Counts):  The Court Order for the attendance of Jennifer Slay at the residence on Pollywog as issued (7/30/2015) by the judge and agreed with State’s Attorney and all involved was that the owner should have notice and opportunity to attend any personal property removal from his property.  Irrespective of how the violation occurred whether fault of Slay, the County, or the State is no matter to the land owner.  Slay is/was accountable for the Court Order and violated it.  As the County/State partied with Slay in her removal, theft, etc and as they continue to use hoax charges to harass the landowner, the State/County must take action of clearly demonstrate collusion…………..Further to this, it appears Unlawful entries were made by Slay’s crew on 7/29-30/2015 while Whidden was detained, 7/31/2015 (Once with law enforcement, once without), on the morning of 8/1/2015, and subsequent to 8/1/2015 and before Sheriff reporting on breaking and entering as reported on 8/4/2015.   An injunction/restraining order is needed for Jennifer Slay and her crew/accomplices.

6)      Conspiracy to Defraud:  Jennifer Slay’s text message system on her phone should demonstrate to the State’s Attorney office that on or about May 14-17, 2015 apparently the last text Slay ever sent to Mr Whidden stated that Jennifer Slay had her own “Game to Play” and was planning to use law enforcement to further her game.  This is clearing conspiring to defraud, and in thus stating she introduces a corrupt nature to these proceedings.  Meanwhile, in a related case Jennifer Slay has alluded to, or stated in police reports (false reporting) that she was denied access or entry to the property.  In truth accurate research using the WFECA records of David Weeks will show 2-3 locks were put on prior to Mr. Whidden being notified by WFECA.  Interestingly this occurred very quickly after the final “game” text.  (This is false reporting, criminal mischief, fraud, conspiracy to defraud, abuse of process---- at a minimum),  As evidenced in various patterns of travel on the farm at Pollywog, Jennifer Slay had access to/thru the farm throughout May, June, and July 2015 despite her statements otherwise.

7)      Criminal Mischief (multiple counts)

A)     See “Conspiracy to Defraud” following.  (This is false reporting, criminal mischief, fraud, conspiracy to defraud, abuse of process---- at a minimum)

B)      It is abundantly clear that multiple criminal indiscretions have taken place on or around the Whidden property by Slay and her crew including but not limited to: Child Endangerment, Drug Manufacture, Drug Distribution, Receiving and handling of Stolen Property, Trespassing, Felony Trespassing, etc.

C)      Note all the charges listed above and outlined herein constituting multiple attempts/inflictions.

8)      Threats (verbal):  Digital recordings of someone claiming to be Jennifer Slay’s husband.

9)      Aiding and Abetting Fraud

A)     See “Conspiracy to Defraud”, (This is false reporting, criminal mischief, fraud, conspiracy to defraud, abuse of process---- at a minimum)

B)      The recordings by Jennifer Slay’s “husband” indicate she has informed him as he conveys in the recording that she has paid some form of rent “Every month”.  This is aiding and abetting her fraud, and it is fraud on his part.

10)   Harassment:  All of the herein listed is apparently to induce some kind of change in the landowner’s approach.  As the landlord allows Jennifer Slay to “Play out her game”, she continues making mistakes.  These mistakes are costly to the landowner.  The restrictions on his work, travel, requirements for reporting, partaking, and any/all changes in Mr. Whidden’s lifestyle choices or impediments to his freedom is harassment.  Yes, probation, arrest, detainment, etc are State issued harassment based on false police reporting, criminal mischief and the list herein that keeps going on and on.

11)   Aiding and Abetting Harassment (Criminal Mischief):  Jennifer Slay appears to have had others party with her, and has partied with them in her abuses to Mr Whidden’s property and freedom.

12)   Trespassing (Multiple Counts)  Unlawful entries were made on 7/29-30/2015 while Whidden was detained, 7/31/2015 (Once with law enforcement, once without), on the morning of 8/1/2015, and subsequent to 8/1/2015 and before Sheriff reporting on breaking and entering as reported on 8/4/2015.   An injunction/restraining order is needed for Jennifer Slay and her crew/accomplices.  As evidenced in various patterns of travel on the farm at Pollywog, Jennifer Slay had access to/thru the farm throughout May, June, and July 2015 despite her statements otherwise.

13)   Trespass of a conveyance (Multiple Counts):  Jennifer Slay unlawful return to the dwelling on Pollywog, both with and without law enforcement constitutes trespass of a conveyance per Florida law.  These violations are stipulated above as 7/29-30/2015, 7/31/2015 (once with law enforcement, once without), 8/1/2015, and prior to 8/4/2015.

14)   Felony Trespassing:  If the officer who attended the property with Jennifer Slay had a firearm, then her party was Felony Trespassing.  If she or others had firearms, they were as well, but clearly one in her party was armed.  (Note: It is not the property owner’s problem as to how/when/why the State’s Attorney office violated the agreement of the day before and sent an armed officer to attend with a known criminal to remove belongings.  This is for the Courts to decide.)

15)   Violation of a written order for trespassing:  As the Sheriff’s office and State’s Attorney files clearly demonstrate a lawful notice of trespass was served on the violator, Jennifer Slay on 5/7/2015.  Presumably she used this in her filing stating that someone (whom she cannot identify) denied her access to the property.  The trespass notice has been filed with the County Sheriff and thus the State’s Attorney’s office by way of Sheriff.  Slay’s return at any/all times was violation of a trespass order which she knew was in effect.  (All property subject to the trespass order was abandoned property, thus Jennifer Slay had no belongings whatsoever.  The Court/State failed to establish the right to property, inventory, or proper controls in that regard.)

16)   Vandalism (Multiple counts): 

A)     The deputy who attended with Jennifer Slay should be able to attest to trash being left throughout the property, alongside buildings, in a trailer nearby, and throughout the yard.

B)      The deputy should be aware of the condition of the refrigerator, blood in the floor, and trash within the house.

C)      The deputy (and the State) should be aware of the Hazardous Material waste from Jennifer Slay’s meth production, manufacture, and distribution operation present on the property.  Note: This and other points were advised to the State’s Attorney office via the Sheriff’s Office in writing 7/31/2015, and should be part of the State’s file.  The State and County’s lack of interest/action on this problem is suspect.  Including this reporting, Whidden may have reported in eight (8) or more times with low to no results.  Removal of the hazardous material is the responsibility of the “Tenant” if “Landlord-Tenant” exists, because the “tenant” is claiming all property on the site.  The State/County needs to engage this problem.

17)   Littering

A)     As stated in vandalism above.

B)      All trash remaining on the property from the attendance both past and present is responsibility of Jennifer Slay.

C)      All Meth production/dumping remnants behind the property are responsibility of the offendant Jennifer Slay.

18)   Drug paraphernalia/Products for making Crystal Meth

A)     Notice in the text messages to/from Jennifer Slay, she was advised on ongoing “Plastics” in the sewage.   She stated, “The kids knew better” (roughly paraphrased.)

B)      Notice when she was told of hazardous material onsite she never inquired what or where it was as she KNEW!

C)      Notice when she was advised that evidence of Crystal meth operations and dumping was nearby she never inquired for the safety of her children, location, or delved deeper.

D)     Notice when advised that dumping of Crystal Meth remnants and toxins hazardous to persons was present onsite, she attempted blameshifting that she did not know how to cook dope.  Note she was never accused of “cooking”.  There was a dumping problem.  Notice for better or worse the dumping problem stopped when the chain/lock went on the gate.

E)      Notice she was greatly offended by the use of yellow caution tape around the dwelling, but never inquired what it was about or why.

F)      Notice one of the greatest single deterrents to her dumping activities seems to be the yellow caution tape.

G)     All the while with exposure problems, trespass notices, discussion of risk, drugs, etc, Jennifer Slay never inquired as to what the suspicion was about, nor what risk/damage it is was to her kids.

H)     Notice: No matter what bullshit the State comes up with about “Landlord-Tenant”, denial of personal property, or anything else, they can’t fault an owner for advising all interested of an unmanageable toxic waste dump on the property.

I)        Text messages on Jennifer Slay’s account will establish that she was told that no one could access/enter the property, with reason stated.

J)       The threatening phone calls referred to herein elsewhere which refer also to law enforcement assistance these hooligans have is the only known acknowledgement of the “Meth” notifications.  This allegedly comes from the father of the children (so he says) and apparently he is comfortable with his children being in this toxic environment (See Child Endangerment).

19)   Conspiring to manufacture and distribute an illicit drug

20)   Child Abuse/Child Endangerment (Multiple Counts)

A)     The State/County has been advised of active, ongoing illicit drug manufacture on the property at Pollywog lane. The evidence remains.

B)      Evidence and run off from the illicit drug production has been on the ground, and flowing while the Jennifer Slay squatted the property.  The evidence remains.

C)      The mere existence of raw sewage on the ground poses a risk to child endangerment.  The evidence remains.

D)     The crystal meth remnants on the ground poses a risk to children. The evidence remains.

E)      The threatening phone calls from a person claiming to be Jennifer Slay’s husband, father of the children, with connections to law enforcement is the only known acknowledgement that there is/was a Meth problem on the ground at the property.  Rather than taking action to remove the children from this hostile and hazardous area they rebuffed the “cause” of the spill, rather than reacting to its presence for the safety of the children.

F)      As it regards the man on the phone recordings alleging to be the children’s father, this person is a risk to them and others.  Noting a number of odd issues such as the way Jennifer Slay blacked out the windows and such, it appears she was using this place as an off the radar hideout from this hooligan.  Meanwhile, when it became convenient she called in her hooligan husband for her dirty work.  Clearly birds of a feather flock together.  (My presumption is this person is James Slay whom she keeps initiating abuse charges, but drops them as well.) (Clearly there are violent, criminal and possibly drug issues ongoing here.)

G)     The sewage lines were detached from the house when Jennifer Slay arrived to “clean” for the land owner.  The sewage lines went thru a number of changes in the weeks to follow the initiation of squatting.  Lines remain detached as they have been for 2 months.

H)     The sewage line once reinstalled new collapsed under the weight of the lithium batteries, plastics, garbage, and shit coming from the toilet of Jennifer Slay (complainant).

I)        The septic tank was inspected, pumped by a contractor, then “clean-out” was diverted to the ground to see what was causing the problem.  Raw sewage was on the ground, and clearly an ongoing dumping problem from the dwelling.  Hazardous material was on the ground which came from the dwelling.  The landlord could not keep up with the destruction of property.  The risk to the children was the operation or disposal from inside whether being “cooked” there or not.  The risk was the existence of product in the house, and outside the house on the ground.

J)       Due to the hazardous situation behind the dwelling someone put a 4x4 post against the back door presumably to keep the kids from going out the door.  This restriction made the dwelling as a dwelling a hazard (potential fire hazard) for children.  The misuse/abuse of the property and the children put the landowner in a “damned if you do, damned if you don’t position.  There are/were just too many risks.

K)      The back steps of the property which was under construction when the complainant squatted the property posed a risk to the children.  The bottom step is knee high or higher, because the dwelling was not ready for occupants, and ongoing rebuild project was taking place.  The ongoing hazardous material dumping put the owner, kids, and everyone at risk.  While it was flowing there was no way to properly reconcile the situation, yet all indications that new pipe was being used to convey plastics, batteries and solids directly to the ground from an inside toilet left no doubt as to where it was coming from.  Only an idiot could miss that.

L)       The County uses the Pollywog property for dumping “Equine Rescue” primarily donkeys.  Livestock management and dumping of risky animals by the County poses a risk of danger to the children.

M)   Jennifer Slay’s  use of the property for housing, maneuvering, and/or liquidating stolen property poses a risk to the children.

N)     Jennifer Slay  forced her children to carry raw sewage in buckets.  In my 7/31/2015 brief/report to the State’s Attorney office by way of the Sheriff’s office I presented photos of the “soup bucket” the oldest child of Jennifer Slay was required to carry and/or dump sewage with.  Often she was required to manage the shit bucket when there was no electricity, water, or services to the dwelling, thereby not allowing the child to wash up after taking shit from people.

O)     Jennifer Slay forced her children to live in a place without running water.

P)      Jennifer Slay forced her children to live in a place without electricity.

Q)     Jennifer Slay forced her children to live without air conditioning.

R)      Jennifer Slay under her conditions of unlawful habitation was found to be unable to maintain power (electricity) to the property, which by default halted any water use.

S)      Jennifer Slay will likely accuse someone else of interrupting her services.  Interesting approach, but…………What did she do with service issues?  Why?  Jennifer Slay’s lies about service provision/interruption is subject of falsification of reports to law enforcement and the State.

T)      Child Protective services need to be involved because of the squatter/complainant’s own statements she failed to sufficiently provide safe housing, services, etc, and in so doing perpetually endangers her children.

U)     Jennifer Slay was ordered to leave the property as a trespasser and for failing to maintain any aspect of normal habitation.  She was notified as a trespasser, because there are/were no other documents stipulating her permission or existence. .  She was notified that her unlawful activity was not to be conducted at the property (A condition of normal tenancy under the Laws of the State of Florida.)

V)     The State must understand that the unlawful habitation by the complainant and the unlawful nature of their activities would make the landowner liable for these gross negligence issues to the children.  These gross negligence issues were brought on in large part by the complainant and complainant’s irregular nature of her demand for dwelling use/access.

21)   Falsification of Police Reports (Multiple Counts)

A)     As an example of falsification of police reports, Jennifer Slay apparently stated/alleged that she had in excess of $300 of items “stolen”.   As we will see above the items she claims were “stolen” from her, were now “stolen” by her.  Truth be known that at best it is a misdemeanor due to value.  Now that she has the “stolen” goods she may wish to reassess her values.

B)      The items alleged “stolen” from and by Jennifer Slay appear the same however both the State and Slay herself lack any form of inventory or ability to identify items to be included or missing from the inventory.  This not only may eradicate any alleged “Grand Theft” notion, but further serves to obscure the false reporting and response by the State.

C)      The items stolen from Mr Whidden’s property on Pollywog with the assistance of Law Enforcement likely included BOTH items Whidden owned, and remotely a possibility of a few items belonging to Slay.  Slay’s complete removal based on her false reporting and sheriff/State response complicates things.

D)     Items to be found in the dwelling at Pollywog would have likely included dishes, appliances, furniture and more that Jennifer Slay obtained from and on the farm, thus removal with or without assistance, irrespective of Court Order was theft, and attempts to state otherwise is falsification of reporting.

E)      Note:  When Jennifer Slay came to the property to service the property and the owner she claimed at that time to have no possession (nothing whatsoever).  It was agreed she would help work towards setting up a “bunkhouse” type arrangement for Mr Whidden’s health retreat.  All items incorporated in, on, or around the property were for this purpose.  Slay’s statements contrary to this are false statements.

F)      Jennifer Slay sold Whidden furniture and items she had in storage for the purpose of setting up a bunkhouse.  There are indications of this. The furniture alleged to be part of her valuation was Mr. Whidden’s thus removal constitutes theft.  Claiming otherwise constitutes false reporting.

G)     See “Conspiracy to Defraud” above, (This is false reporting, criminal mischief, fraud, conspiracy to defraud, abuse of process---- at a minimum)

H)     In a related case Jennifer Slay has alluded to, or stated in police reports (false reporting) that she was denied access or entry to the property.  In truth accurate research using the WFECA records of David Weeks will show 2-3 locks were put on prior to Mr. Whidden being notified by WFECA.  Interestingly this occurred very quickly after the final “game” text.  (This is false reporting, criminal mischief, fraud, conspiracy to defraud, abuse of process---- at a minimum)

I)        As evidenced in various patterns of travel on the farm at Pollywog, Jennifer Slay had access to/thru the farm throughout May, June, and July 2015 despite her statements otherwise.

J)       approach, but…………What did she do with service issues?  Why?  Jennifer Slay’s lies about service provision/interruption is subject of falsification of reports to law enforcement and the State.

K)      Odds are a host of statements, responses, etc from Jennifer Slay and her accomplices will be found to be without foundation.

22)   Abuse of Process (Multiple Counts)

A)     See “Conspiracy to Defraud” above, (This is false reporting, criminal mischief, fraud, conspiracy to defraud, abuse of process---- at a minimum)

B)      Multiple frauds are leading to abuse of process on the landowner including but not limited to false charges, unsubstantiated charges, baseless claims, without merit.  The State Attorney’s office and local law enforcement is a tool (literally) in the deception and ongoing abuse and harassment of the landowner by a known criminal.

C)      The recorded threats by Jennifer Slay’s “husband” allude to having a brother on the Sheriff’s Department thus giving them some sort of extra liberty with the law.  This is abuse of process or an attempt thereof.

D)     Jennifer Slay in a text refers to advice received from “Officer/Deputy Lee” regarding “Landlord-tenant issues”.  If this is not true, then it is clearly fraud and criminal mischief.  If it is true then Deputy Lee is “practicing Law without a license” and chargeable thusly.  As we can all see the State has no case whatsoever on “Landlord Tenant” or “Denial of Access”.  They have based frivolous charges on Whidden based on hearsay (fraud, conspiracy to defraud, criminal mischief, etc.)  If the Court must be involved in any way to determine validity of “Landlord-Tenant” then Deputy Lee and all deputies counselling Whidden, Slay or anyone in this regard (or others for that matter) on Landlord-Tenant law are practicing law without a license.  (The County/Sheriff’s office is way out of line in this regard routinely, and need to curtail their zeal to counsel in this regard.)  Yet, failure to properly receive, use, or seek advice and mis-application by Slay is Slay’s responsibility.

E)      Jennifer Slay and her accomplices seem to feel like they have some kind of special protection by law enforcement.  I am not sure if it is Deputy Lee, the husband’s brother to which he refers to in his nasty phone messages, or if she has some other special talent, use, insight, connection or whatever, but failure for law enforcement to take action granted this ongoing, well documented abuse, versus a “hearsay” case by local authorities seems suspect.  Clearly Jennifer Slay is using “process’ to affect Mr Whidden’s situation including but not limited to warrants, arrests, charges, etc that are totally unsubstantiated.

23)   Felony Fraud:  It is unlawful in the State of Florida for a person to initiate a contract of any kind with full knowledge and understanding that they have no ability nor intention to pay.  This means to move in to a dwelling under the auspices of “Landlord-Tenant” when the “tenant” has no ability or interest in paying is Felony Fraud.  The “Tenant” attempts to dupe the “Landlord” in to a contract that has no possibility for satisfaction.  This shifts all the burdens to the Landlord including costs to maintain, clean, and/or evict if that is deemed necessary.  If Jennifer Slay has ever contended that this was “Landlord-Tenant” or if she has taken the advice of any jackass who said it was, then this is FELONY FRAUD.  She has/had no ability to pay, and records can easily show that her failure to work, her rejection of work by Mr. Whidden, refusal to return/respond to work requests, and the fact that she “hid-out” for weeks avoiding the owner indicates she knew she was committing a series of crimes.  Research into her financial dealings would show she had no ability to pay to move in, or to pay to stay under any reasonable terms.  If she states she was a “Tenant” then as a “Tenant” she must be able to demonstrate cashflows and/or attempts to pay otherwise by her own admission and statements she is convicting herself of FELONY FRAUD.  The Felony Fraud trial and conviction does not even need Mr Whidden to witness or be present.  The obligation is fully hers, and she can be convicted on her own testimony.  Of course this will get muddled with her multiple false reportings to officials.  (State officials and law enforcement must recognize and understand this potential for abuse and litigation by the “tenant”.  If they are not prosecuted the entire burden is upon the landowner, and it is clearly a conspiracy to defraud.  I can almost guarantee you that it seems everyone who tries this has other felonious activity ongoing, and often these days it involves illicit drug use, production, and distribution.  That way they have nothing invested in the property or problems it brings, and they can more easily separate themselves from the problem……………So irregardless of all else, Jennifer Slay should be prosecuted for Felony Fraud if the State can demonstrate “Landlord-Tenant”………… Meanwhile in the Child Endangerment area listed above the inability to provide or maintain normal “services” such as electricity, water, air conditioning, food, etc would point to the FACT that there was no ability at any point in time (Thus no intention) to pay any form of rent.  The whole premise of “Landlord-Tenant” if it exists at all is undermined with a Felony Fraud attempt by the “Tenant” commences.  Jennifer Slay’s fraud is initiated and perfected according to her own testimony………Foundationally the Felony Fraud of the perceived “Tenant” makes the “contract” of tenancy an unenforceable contract.  The contract thusly lacks the four elements of a contract and if anyone proves there is/was a Landlord-Tenant situation then the clear and obvious fraud overrides it.  The failure to maintain basic services demonstrates inability to pay rent (the much larger expense).

A)     NOTE: It is determined despite Jennifer Slay’s claims that she did not have a lease subject to law then her statements otherwise constitute false reporting to law enforcement, false arrest, and a host of other related infractions.  You see with this charge, she can’t have her cake and eat it to.  She has committed a series of conflicting crimes.  The State seems to be remiss in these situations for not prosecuting to stop this run on harassment of landowners.

B)      If the State determines there is no lease, the all trespass notices and violations are in place.

C)      If the State determines there is no lease, than theft (Grand Theft) of the abandoned property has occurred as outlined.

24)   Permanent Injunction/Restraining order needed.  Unlawful entries were made on 7/29-30/2015 while Whidden was detained, 7/31/2015 (Once with law enforcement, once without), on the morning of 8/1/2015, and subsequent to 8/1/2015 and before Sheriff reporting on breaking and entering as reported on 8/4/2015.   An injunction/restraining order is needed for Jennifer Slay and her crew/accomplices.  Permanent restraining orders are needed against both Jennifer Slay, and presumably James Slay who I do not know that I have ever met, yet conveys threats over the phone.

 

For the record loss revenues of all kinds, and expenses of all kinds related to this mess is responsibility of those wrongfully using process and procedure to harass the undersigned.  I reserve the right to quantify this as I see fit and submit it when I see fit.  Further, the ongoing harassment and court requirements is restraining my ability to work and travel.  If/when the State realizes they have frivolous pursuits against Mr Whidden it would behoove everyone for these charges to be dropped and stricken from the record.

 

 

 

 

Character Witness:

It is my understanding that Jennifer Slay at one time when trying to evade a violent ex-husband/husband (presumably the person on the phone making threats on the recording), was directed by the Court and/or Law Enforcement to find shelter.  My understanding is that Justin Hurst and his wife (at the time) opened his home to Jennifer Slay in her time of need.  While there, Justin advises she stole numerous items and attempted to sell or return them.  Somehow Jennifer Slay has remained off of law enforcement radar up until now.  It is time for Law Enforcement to take notice.

As a character witness, Justin Hurst of 7080 Gilley Road, Grand Ridge, Florida can attest to Jennifer Slay’s ongoing criminal activities which may include:

1)      Theft of houseware items, and valuables.

2)      Theft of houseware items in new packaging where possible for return (laundering) at stores such as Walmart/Lowes with relaxed return policies.

3)      Walmart and other stores should have an abnormal record of returns especially houseware items by Jennifer Slay.

4)      Pawn shops in the area likely have her on account for pawning/selling low use items.  (It is anticipated her “returns” far exceed any documented income for obvious reasons.  (The returns are her income!!))

5)      Jennifer Slay poses as a person to clean households and offices and seems to be using this as a ruse to access and steal personal property.  Her clients will likely either find household items removed with or without packaging, Empty packaging in storage, and/or completely removed goods and packaging are among her approaches it seems.

6)      Medical equipment missing and/or dismantled at my farm, as well as the alleged “Doctor office work” indicates she may have habits that include use or dismantling, disposal of medical equipment.  The officer in attendance during his unlawful visit could have/should have seen disabled breathing equipment in his “investigation”.  This was mentioned the brief that was ignored.

7)      Drugs, substantial use or appearance of use of drugs.  There are numerous signs.

My understanding is that Justin Hurst has known Jennifer Slay since “kindergarten” and has assisted her personally in the past only to find she was robbing him and others as well.  He can likely guide you to others to attest to her criminal behavior.  If not mistaken I believe it was stated that her own parents have “written her off” because of her past behavior.

 

Supreme Court ruled unanimously written by Judge William Rehnquist concerning Hustler Magazine v Jerry Falwell

"At the heart of the First Amendment is the recognition of the fundamental importance of the free flow of ideas and opinions on matters of public interest and concern. The freedom to speak one's mind is not only an aspect of individual liberty – and thus a good unto itself – but also is essential to the common quest for truth and the vitality of society as a whole."

Supreme Court Judge Scalia wrote concerning Pope v Illinois

"Just as there is no use arguing about taste, there is no use litigating about it."

Copyright May 2016, All rights reserved by Ted Whidden