www.FraudDocumentation.com   

 

Home

RICO Act Violation

Buy the Book, Fraud: The Unforgivable Crime

www.TheBrainCan.com

Contact Us



===

www.tedwhidden.com

Facebook

 'Ted' Theodore Lewis Whidden

Create Your Badge

 
     Exposing Fraud and Deception to protect the public good.

    www.frauddocumentation.com     www.frauddemonstration.com    www.frauddevelopment.com  

Sanctions Request for H.Guy Green, Public Defender, and the Public Defender office:

Please impose Sanctions on H. Guy Green and bar him from any further practice within this Court.  As a result of his corruption, incompetence, and collusion the client/Defendant has lost a substantial amount of work due to abnormal delay of this frivolous case.  Five months of lost work for the client amounts to potentially $105,000 in lost income.  Expenses are high and presently the records shows that Whidden has more than $300,000 worth of real estate in Jackson County for sale as a result of the duress of this situation.  The Defendant has begun selling off tractors, farm assets, etc to cover overheads and expenditures.  The financial impact of the waste, fraud, and abuse within this Court system is substantial.

The State’s Attorney has operated in conjunction with Green (thus Collusion) and will be similarly charged in a separate document.

The nature of the client/Defendant’s work is that he gets paid at the end of project.   If Defendant can get work back on track by January 2016, then it will likely be June 2016 before he gets paid.  As a result Defendant requests an additional six months wages ($126,000) in sanctions.

Total requested Sanctions $231,000

 

Conflict of Interest:

1)    Collusion with State’s Attorney office as outlined in part below and elsewhere.  Both the incompetents at the State’s Attorney office and Green’s office partied to call some 50 people for deposition on a single morning of 10/8/2015

A)   As a result all failed to properly prepare.

B)    As a result ALL cases were compromised opening the door for Mis-trials, Misconduct, and Dismissal.  (See additional filing in this regard.)

C)    State’s Attorney office clearly colluded with Green as evidenced in the inept use of the Deposition process.

2)    Failure to Recuse himself from file for conflict of interest:  On 10/8/2015 Guy Green ineptly claims to have deposed some fifty people as referenced below.  In one of those depositions Guy Green learned the lead witness for the prosecution was a very good friend of his (Charles Pumphrey).  As a requirement of law Guy Green should have immediately removed (recused) himself from the case.

A)   In the Jennifer Slay Deposition at minute 13:08 Green asks Jennifer Slay who else was with her at the property.  She puffs up and states, “Charles Pumphrey”.  Green acknowledges on tape that he knows Charles Pumphrey.  Deposition is closed prematurely at 14+minutes.

B)    On 10/20/2015 in the chambers of the Jackson County Courthouse Green advises his client Whidden that he knows the lead witness for the prosecution, is his friend, and “likes” him.  H.Guy Green is clearly conflicted.

3)    Failure to Perform Fiduciary Duties:

A)   Guy Green refused to accept evidence or list of witnesses from the client (Theodore L Whidden)

B)    Guy Green failed to take necessary actions to provide adequate defense for his client.

C)    Guy Green bragged to client that he got paid “win, lose, or draw”, that it made no difference to him either way.  (This was done on 10/8/2015, while Green knowingly acknowledged conflict of interest.

D)   Guy Green refused to return calls or communicate with his client.  No communication, nor attempt from Green’s office since mid-October 2015.  One month as of 11/17/2015 with no communication.

E)    Guy Green went into a hoax deposition (Jennifer Slay 10/8/2015 0935 hours) with 142 pre-written multi-part questions on the case at hand (Grand Theft) and failed to use a single question.  Green spent 14 minutes in a Grand Theft case talking about “Landlord-Tenant”.

F)    Guy Green’s office advises that he deposed fifty (50!) people on 10/8/2015.  It is impossible for any attorney to prepare and depose that many people in two weeks, much less in one morning.

G)   Guy Green deposed all fifty (??) people for the same morning, thus causing waste/fraud/abuse of the County and State resources, as well as all those involved and their place of business.

H)   Guy Green’s hoax deposition of the “Investigator” was booked for 0930 with second deposition for 0935 on 10/8/2015.  It is impossible/improbable that a proper deposition could be done in 5 minutes.

I)       Guy Green’s office refused to provide copy of the Larry Birges deposition as requested by his client, Theodore Whidden.

J)      In the deposition of Jennifer Slay it is clear that lack of preparation has Guy Green winded with no real questions 4 minutes in to the 14+ minute deposition.  Lack of preparation is apparent.

K)    Guy Green’s entire deposition of Jennifer Slay revolves around “Landlord-Tenant” discussion and he never adequately addresses or questions the “Grand Theft” issues which is what the case/charges are all about.

L)     Guy Green’s failure to perform in the deposition gives both the claimant (Jennifer Slay) and the prostituting attorney (State’s Attorney office) a false sense of security in the frivolous case/claims.

M)Guy Green’s incompetence and corruption is criminal in that he in this instance (and routinely) abuses victims of the Court, Court Resources, State/County Resources, etc.

N)  Guy Green’s mis-use of his position constitutes at minimum:

i)                   Ethics Violations

ii)                Abuse of Process

iii)              Criminal Mischief

iv)              Fraud

v)                Abuse of Public Resources

vi)              Failure in his Fiduciary Duties

vii)            

4)    On 10/8/2015 Guy Green deposed FIFTY (50!) people more or less on one day at seemingly the same time.

A)   Deposing FIFTY people would be impossible in a week, much less a single day.

B)    Deposing so many people at once is ABUSE OF PROCESS.

C)    Deposing so many people at once is MALISCIOUS PROSECUTION.

D)   Deposing so many people is CRIMINAL MISCHIEF.

5)    Clearly an attorney who deposes FIFTY people all at once has a conflict of interest.

6)    Clearly the opposing counsel (State’s Attorney office) is party to the criminal activity to allow FIFTY people to be called for one incompetent attorney.

7)    Guy Green came away with his inept attempt at deposition and found that one of his best friends (riding buddies) was the only witness for the complainant.  At that point the crooked bastard knew he had a conflict of interest in the case and should have removed himself.  He did not.

8)    Guy Green failed to read the file.

9)    Guy Green failed to prepare for any meeting on the file.

10)                      Guy Green failed to prepare for deposition.

11)                      Guy Green was given 142 multi-part questions to ask in the first deposition.  He did not ask any of them, and failed to ask the one critical question necessary to explore the case.  (One simple question can win/shift this case.  Guy Green will never find nor repeat that question from the looks of it.)

12)                      Guy Green’s office has misled me multiple times.

A)   In reference to evidence presentation.

B)    In reference to nomination of witnesses.

C)    In reference to process and procedure.

13)                      When Guy Green was informed there was an ongoing Crystal Meth operation on the property, he asked the defendant if that was illegal or not.  He advised he would have to look it up to see if it was legal or not to cook meth in a rental house.

14)                      The foregoing at a minimum constitutes:

A)   Obstruction of Justice

B)    Criminal Contempt of Court

C)    Tampering with Evidence

D)   Harassment

E)    Criminal Mischief (Multiple Counts)

F)    Violation of Court Order

G)   Conspiracy to Defraud (Accomplice)

H)   Failure to properly investigate

I)       Tampering with Evidence (Accomplice)

J)      Abuse of Process

K)    Misprision of Felony (Accessory After the Fact)

L)     Compounding a Crime

M)Collusion

N)  Collusion with a criminal (Aiding and Abetting)

O)  Fraud (Accomplice)

P)    Aiding and Abetting multiple frauds

Q)  Aiding and Abetting a Conspiracy to Defraud

R)    Aiding and Abetting 24+ counts charged against Jennifer Slay.

15)                      Guy Green’s office and office personnel routinely discuss cases, clients, and the nature of cases and clients with other clients.  Guy Green fails to recognize “Attorney-Client Privelege” information.

A)   One can easily walk in to Green’s office and hear or partake in any manner of discussion.

B)    Green’s receptionist seems to have some kind of mental or social problem.  She often discusses private or personal matters of cases with the wrong persons.

C)    Guy Green’s “assistant” (Lynn) routinely gives misdirection and mis-information on files.

i)                   Lynn was requested to get copy of the Larry Birge deposition which she failed to request or provide copy.

ii)                Lynn was requested status of the “Charles Pumphrey” deposition which Guy Green advised on 10/20/2015 that he needed.  Lynn failed to advise.

iii)              Lynn received 142 suggested questions for the Jennifer Slay deposition which were not apparently delivered or used on the Slay case.

iv)              Lynn received a call the day before the Slay deposition.  She continued her misdirection regarding attendance/presence at the deposition, use of questions, nature of questions, etc.

v)                Lynn advised Whidden (defendant) that on the day of the Slay deposition Green had some FIFTY other depositions and he would not as a result have time for asking any questions……???

vi)              Lynn advised that Green routinely sets up big days for Depositions with fifty or so at one time.

vii)           Lynn was advised that no attorney can properly prepare and execute fifty depositions in a week, much less one day.  Lynn advised they do it all the time.

viii)         Lynn gave misinformation about the ability and timing for witnesses of both the Defendant and the Prosecution side of the file.

ix)              As a “gate keeper” on the file at Green’s office, Green is largely at fault for criminal incompetence and corruption, but Lynn routinely inserts her own level of misdirection, corruption, and incompetence.

I would like to remove the incompetent, crooked, low integrity counsel appointed by the State.  I reserve the right to address the State, County, and Green’s office in other pursuits for the inappropriate handling of this case.  Meanwhile, the State’s Attorney’s office has partied with this abuse all along, and despite the common belief they are held accountable.  State’s Attorney partnered with Green in collusion to commit the foregoing.  I move the case be dismissed as a result.

Please prepare to dismiss this case, and

Please impose Sanctions on H. Guy Green and bar him from any further practice within this Court.  As a result of his corruption, incompetence, and collusion the client/Defendant has lost a substantial amount of work due to abnormal delay of this frivolous case.  Five months of lost work for the client amounts to potentially $105,000 in lost income.  Expenses are high and presently the records shows that Whidden has more than $300,000 worth of real estate in Jackson County for sale as a result of the duress of this situation.  The Defendant has begun selling off tractors, farm assets, etc to cover overheads and expenditures.  The financial impact of the waste, fraud, and abuse within this Court system is substantial.

The State’s Attorney has operated in conjunction with Green (thus Collusion) and will be similarly charged in a separate document.

The nature of the client/Defendant’s work is that he gets paid at the end of project.   If Defendant can get work back on track by January 2016, then it will likely be June 2016 before he gets paid.  As a result Defendant requests an additional six months wages ($126,000) in sanctions.

Total requested Sanctions $231,000

 

Supreme Court ruled unanimously written by Judge William Rehnquist concerning Hustler Magazine v Jerry Falwell

"At the heart of the First Amendment is the recognition of the fundamental importance of the free flow of ideas and opinions on matters of public interest and concern. The freedom to speak one's mind is not only an aspect of individual liberty – and thus a good unto itself – but also is essential to the common quest for truth and the vitality of society as a whole."

Supreme Court Judge Scalia wrote concerning Pope v Illinois

"Just as there is no use arguing about taste, there is no use litigating about it."

Copyright May 2016, All rights reserved by Ted Whidden